huppakee

I disagree in the sense that i believe it can be interpreted multiple ways if you look at it without any context, but i do also understand it can no longer be seen as neutral because only a single group is using it. Don’t get me wrong, i’m not saying anyone should see it as neutral; but that the way you use it does define its meaning. You can use it anti-black (all lives matter = black lives aren’t worth more) or in support of black people (all lives matter = black people deserve to be safe from police-brutality just like everybody else). Same goes with the original comment, you could see it as $1000 for everybody because trans women shouldn’t get special treatment but as i believe in this case the original commenter meant if you give everybody $1000 trans people are helped by that as well. Below is an image explaining the result between equity and equality, i understand original commenter is not talking about equity for trans women. I’m defending them while understanding that difference.

All lives matter could mean a good thing, it got hijacked by right wing people who believe racism is some kind of hoax. But if I were to say for example that all lives matter which means black people deserve the same standards, black people would understand i am on their side too. The original commenter mentioning ubi (universal basic income) also signifies they are on the side of trans women (or to be more honest, minorities who find it hard to earn their living). If there would be something like ebi these women still face the same issues, but at least they can buy food and rent a home (although $1000 might not be enough in the US).

is conveniently ignored

The answer to why so many animals suffer their entire life so they can be eaten afterwards.